E.9 Sizing up the Local: Situating the Subject of Micro-art-history
Sat Oct 21 / 8:30 – 10:00 / KC 101 103
chair /
- Martha Langford, Concordia University
I once asked an abstract painter how he determined the size of the canvas that he would be acting upon: “It’s the limit of my reach,” he answered, “I need to be able to get my hands around it.” It seemed to me the perfect encapsulation of the phenomenological attitude (further research revealed it as a trope). Conceptual art similarly explored the physical limits and mindfulness of bounded space—walking, mapping, drawing parentheses around. More current examples include the performing body as an archive; oral histories of craft or craftivist circles; or writing object-lives from the holdings of a diasporic historical society. Global and local are entangled. Studying the local—writing from within one’s ideational village—remains crucial, but defining a micro-art-historical project is increasingly daunting. This call for papers appeals to art historians, theorists, and practitioners who have braved the anecdote and excavated the footnote to situate their work.
keywords: local, global, historiography, methodology
session type: panel
Martha Langford is Research Chair and Director of the Gail and Stephen A. Jarislowsky Institute for Studies in Canadian Art, a Distinguished University Research Professor in the Department of Art History, Concordia University (Montreal), and a fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. Related publications include Narratives Unfolding: National Art Histories in an Unfinished World (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017); “Who Can Tell? Photographic Histories and Counter-histories of Mennonite Communities in Canada,” in Linda M. Morra and Sarah Henzi, eds., On The Other Side(s) of 150: Untold Stories and Critical Approaches to History, Literature, and Identity in Canada (WLU Press, 2021); Photogenic Montreal: Activisms and Archives in a Post-industrial City (co-edited with Johanne Sloan, MQUP, 2021); and Collection Thinking: Within and Without Libraries, Archives, and Museums (co-edited with Jason Camlot and Linda M. Morra, 2023). She is currently completing a history of photography in Canada.
A Little Bit of the Alps in Bethlehem
- Braden Lee Scott, Bibliotheca Hertziana—Max Planck Institute for Art History
In 1448, Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy, initiated plans to replace the wooden beams of the Bethlehem Basilica’s roof. By 1484, his heirs Charles and Mary saw the project through to completion. Philip had nurtured connections with the monks of the Franciscan order who lived in and around Jerusalem, but unlike his father and grandfather who led gruesome crusades against Islam, Philip was a “soft crusader.” Instead of leading a bloody war in the Levant, he invested Burgundy’s resources in Levantine Christian infrastructure. Burgundy’s material investiture included the replacement of the Bethlehem Basilica’s ancient West Asian cedar beams with Central European larch. Philip began by requesting permission from the pope to carry out the renovation; he then negotiated for larch trees from the Alpine mountains to be felled, cut into planks, and brought downriver to Venice for shipment. But why go through all the effort when cedar was still readily abundant in Syria? It was, after all, ancient custom to build Jewish, Christian, and Islamic architecture with cedar, a wood that had magical origins in West Asian mythologies. I argue that to replace cedar with larch wood shifted the context of architectural diplomacy to accommodate a new set of European symbolic values in Bethlehem. This is to say that in Burgundy’s vision for renovations, European architectural wood materially abstracted and conveyed a European landscape to the so-called “Holy Land.” By microcosmically occupying parts of Mamluk Syria without waging war, the renovation effected Burgundy’s “soft crusade.”
keywords: architectural wood, infrastructure, diplomacy, materiality, global art histories
Braden Lee Scott is an FRQSC postdoctoral research fellow at the Bibliotheca Hertziana—Max Planck Institute for Art History. He was previously a 2022-2023 curatorial research fellow at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. In 2023, he completed a PhD in Art History at McGill University.
From Forms to Form: Micro-art-histories of Bureaucracy and the Practice of Bureaucratic Everyday Life
- Raphaël Ouellet, Université du Québec à Montréal
This communication seeks to investigate the ways in which artists who seek funding, or to have their works shown, bought, and collected, divert and deflect bureaucratic proceedings and standards. Bureaucracy is generally perceived as an antithesis to art and to imagination alike. And yet, most, if not all, organizations within the field are governed through its principles: museums, art councils, artist-run centres, private galleries, and foundations are administered through impersonal rules, norms, and proceedings. In the last few decades, neoliberal rule seems to have exacerbated the amount of paperwork to fill, the number of standards and “Good Practices” to uphold. However, to comprehend the role that bureaucracy plays in the art ecosystem, we need not only understand these formalities in the abstract, but also how they are really applied by cultural workers and artists. I therefore wish to examine all the ways in which they work with, against and despite bureaucracy, in a dynamic of creation of the bureaucratic everyday life (De Certeau, 1990). Following political scientist Béatrice Hibou (2012), this refers to the elaboration of a study of cultural bureaucracy “from the bottom:” in other words, a micro-art-history of the bureaucratic.
As the artistic profession is already marked by precarity, these diversions become ways to negotiate bureaucratic and aesthetic injunctions. However transgressive these acts might seem, we can assume that most bureaucrats know about them, and most of them let them slide, most of the time. I therefore aim to understand the bureaucratic role we all must play, and what are the breaches between the artistic personal and the bureaucratic impersonal put forth by artists and administrators. From there, I hope that there may exist seeds of artistic organizations beyond bureaucracy.
keywords: arts administration, field of contemporary art, art and politics, bureaucracy, practice of everyday life
Raphaël Ouellet (he/they) is a cultural worker, author and art historian working in Montréal/Tiohtià:ke/Mooniyang and currently studying in the Art History PhD program at Université du Québec à Montréal. His thesis, L’art entre les lignes: Bureaucratie et création and le champ des arts visuels, under the supervision of Barbara Clausen and made possible through the support of SSHRC, seeks to understand the role of neoliberal bureaucracy in the field of contemporary art in Québec, and more broadly in Canada, in terms of its impact on artists’ working conditions, and on the material and aesthetic qualities of the artworks themselves. Ouellet’s texts have been published in Vie des Arts and Inter, art actuel. Their research and writings focus on what is lost through the categories and language of (post)modern capitalism, as well as experimental music, sound, and performance, and on the relationship between contemporary art, administration, and emancipatory politics.
Imperative Artmaking: Prison Art in Canada
- Sheena Hoszko, Queen’s University
Recent large-scale exhibitions and popular podcasts in the USA have brought prisoner cultural production to the forefront, asking viewers to pay attention to intentionally hidden carceral spaces and, more importantly, the people forced to live within them. However, current and historical artmaking practices in Canadian prisons have received less attention. This paper discusses prison art as both an index and a lens of prison life. Artmaking inside encompasses survival strategies, creativity, resistance, and care; demonstrates deteriorating living conditions within institutions coast-to-coast; and documents penal expansion in Canada. Drawing on the work of Nicole Fleetwood, Ben Davis, Gayle K. Horii, and decades of abolitionist organizing by prisoners and outside allies, this paper looks at three digitized and publicly available artworks within Canadian archives of prisoner material culture. Prison artists are vital scholars within the larger prison justice movement, and the carceral materiality of prisoner artmaking affirms more than the middle-class values often asserted within contemporary and historical art ecologies. In making artworks under the repressive conditions of incarceration, prisoner art challenges and builds places and relationships beyond the capitalist and carceral logics of the Canadian settler-colonial state.
keywords: prison art, prisoner material culture, social movements
Sheena Hoszko lives and works in Montréal and is currently a Ph.D. student in the Cultural Studies program at Queen's University. Her research traces artmaking in prison as it relates to prisoner resistance and carceral expansion in Canada. Hoszko holds a BFA and MFA in Sculpture from Concordia University and has exhibited nationally and internationally at the Musée d'art contemporain and Fondation Phi Montréal, A Space and Blackwood in Toronto, Queen's Museum, and La Ferme du Buisson in Paris. Her writing has appeared in M.I.C.E Magazine and Free Inside: The Life and Work of Peter Collins. Hoszko is a longtime anti-prison organizer and works in abolitionist collectives in Montréal and Kingston.